Opinion and observation on a world gone crazy

Joe Gill, journalist and game inventor from Brighton, UK

Friday, 31 August 2012

Mexican court dashes hopes of AMLO over stolen votes

Courtesy of Mexico and Gulf Reporter:

Mexico City -
Defeated Mexican presidential candidate Andrés Manuel López Obrador refused this morning to "recognize the vote buying" of July 1, and told the nation that he would press ahead with efforts to overturn the results.

Last night a federal electoral tribunal ruled against a legal challenge filed by the Democratic Revolution Party (PRD), which López Obrador heads, only days after the ballots were counted. Mexican court rejects leftist bid to void July 1 presidential election; end of the road for PRD, AMLO. The candidate's legal options are now exhausted.

"I cannot accept the ruling of the TEPJF which validated the election," said López Obrador. "The election was neither clean nor free nor authentic. There were grave violations of our constitution and our laws."

In his harshest denunciation yet of Mexico's political process, the fiery leftist told a press conference, "We have to respect our institutions, but the system is held captive by white collar criminals." López Obrador did not say to whom he was referring.

The candidate announced yet another PRD rally for Sept. 9, suggesting that acts of resistance to public authority might be on the way. He said that civil disobedience is "an honorable duty when it's applied against those who would steal hope and the happiness of the people. Although they keep attacking us, calling us poor losers and crazy people, we'd rather put up with those insults than do anything to legitimize an unjust regime which is corrupt, and full of the complicity of many."

López Obrador added, "To recognize these election results would be a farce, and the betrayal of millions of Mexicans. Just as the other side is prepared to defend by any means a corrupt system, so we're prepared to do away with it, and to that end we'll show no quarter, nor yield any advantage."

More from Mexico and Gulf Reporter on the decision here http://www.mexicogulfreporter.com/2012/08/mexican-court-rejects-leftist-bid-to.html

Wednesday, 29 August 2012

Syria and the limits of western sympathy

I read of the latest massacre in Syria in the Damascas suburb of Daraya. Unlike previous reports of killings, this one has not made the headlines. Reports suggest this is a deliberate 'cleansing' operation - a Syrian My Lai or Sabra and Shatilla in the making. Robert Fisk of the Independent has been on the ground with Syrian troops and reports that some of those killed were victims of the FSA. However he is effectively embedded with the Syrian army. The Local Coordination Committees have put out corrections to his piece, saying witnesses blaming the 'Free Army' are probably too initimidated to tell the truth. This is plausible. The fog of war descends and all is confusion.
Syria appears to be falling into the category of wars where the outside looks impotently on because there is no clear strategic interest and great risks of unknown fallout from any decisive intervention. Lebanon, Bosnia, Rwanda. The blowback from Iraq and Afghanistan has arrived in Syria - leave it alone, it will only drag as in to a long and unwinnable occupation where the locals hate us and vote for our enemies. That is the real view in Langley and Whitehall, I suspect. And more so in Tel Aviv. If we cannot control the outcome, then best let both sides fight it out to stalemate, until the talking starts again. Regime destruction will create a black hole which may give rise to something inimical to western and Israeli interests. Preservation of the state is preferable, once Assad leaves or is killed, to Islamist rule.
I have been dismayed at the line taken by NWOers who see Syria as just another US / NWO destabilisation operation. People who see the world through a black and white prism of evildoers and hapless sheeple seem to lack imagination or understanding about what is happening. Not everything fits into a neat script that you find on the internet. The CIA or the Bilderberg group do not control EVERYTHING. For example, when the Arab uprisings began, it is not credible to suggest that the entire process was controlled by US intelligence and its local agents. The US was caught off guard.
If Syria was in the firing line, we would have been getting propaganda messages for weeks and months prior to the uprising. 17 months in and more than 20,000 dead, are the NWOers still insisting that this is just a CIA Mossad plot? Of course, CIA and MI6 are on the ground on the border and probably inside Syria. They maybe assisting with intelligence - that does not make this the West's fight. This is fundamentally a Syrian fight with a range of outside actors involved, primarily Russia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Israel, USA, France and Britain. And of course the jihadists. Muslims in the 21st century can do solidarity better than westerners. The Spanish civil war was a long time ago. The Cubans are the only ones on the left who in the recent past put their feet on the ground to assist others under attack - and that was 20 years ago in southern Africa.

The left should not fall into the trap of backing Assad because of the West's foolish call for him to step down back at the start of the uprising. They had no right to make this call and more importantly no means to enforce it. This pushed Assad into a corner and set the terms of the conflict whereby he could blame all the trouble on the imperialists and zionists. The Assads, like all dictatorships, need useful idiots to help them peddle the myth that their regime is a bastion of antizionism and anti-imperialism. It's one of the saddest jokes of the 20th century that gangsters were able to hoodwink significant sections of their own people and those abroad into believing that their regimes were legitimate representations of the people's aspiration to self determination and freedom in the face of economic backwardness and colonialism. Yes, some revolutions in the former colonial regions could claim to have achieved this and were able to continue to do this even as the people realised that not all their aspirations had been met. Vietnam, Cuba and even China come to mind. Others, such as those of Saddam Hussein, Ethiopia's Mengistu, Idi Amin, the Kims of Korea and many other tyrants used the rhetoric of anticolonialism to justify misrule. Qadafi was one of these, although the picture is not clear cut, in that Libya did enjoy independence and economic development in the first part of his rule.
The Ba'athists of Syria have long since dropped the pretence of representing the will of the Syrian people. Ba'athism rules by terror and nationalist rhetoric. Its main achievements were stability, some development, independence from imperialism and non-sectarianism. These are not insignificant achievements. The one thing the Ba'ath, like their cousins in Saddam's Iraq, could never tolerate was any challenge to their rule. Their response has always been repression and violence. The Hama incident of 1982 in Syria was the bloodiest in the last half century in this region. It began with hundreds of regime officials killed by the Brotherhood before the crackdown by Hafez, father of Bashar, that raised Hama to the ground. Blood begat blood, then as now. The Ba'ath treat the people like cattle. They feed them and keep them but if they become troublesome, they will crush them mercilessly.
Of course, leftists in the West do not support the ideology of Islamism promoted by their longtime opponents the Muslim Brotherhood. Neither does Washington. GlobalResearch and Michel Chussodovskly have been quick to write off the entire Arab uprising as a neoliberal coup. It's too early to call it that. We have to see what happens now that Egypt's president is elected and can shape policy.
The threat of sectarianism breaking out in Syria was used by Assad from the very beginning of the uprising as a way to ensure loyalty from the Alawite, Christian and other minorities in Syria and bind them close of the regime. But for so-called progressives to support the continuance of a regime that is ready to bomb and destroy all the cities of the country, to wipe out whole villages, to kill thousands in order to maintain themselves? This is bankruptcy, moral and political.
We see an unholy alliance of ancien regime critics of the revolutions, and leftists who cannot bear to see a revolution that does not wave the flag of anti-imperialist secularism, while the children and mothers are slaughtered in the streets and called 'terrorists'. It is not for ideologues of any kind, sitting far away, to dictate the nature of any revolution. The desire for freedom from oppression is universal. One can argue that the militarisation of the uprising by the FSA and their Saudi/Qatari backers has been a disaster. But what is to be done in the face of the regime's guns? This is what many Syrians feel. I pity the Syrians, whose only friends are their fellow Muslims who want to see them free. The West have played this very badly and have played their part in creating another Iraq or Lebanon.

Tuesday, 28 August 2012

The Caller - a short story

My short story The Caller was selected by Cazart judges and also by Five Stop Story for an honorary mention.

‘Waiting for call.’ The Call Taker software flashes the familiar message.

For more than a year he has watched and waited until the message changes. ‘Call answered’.

He looks at the call sheet, his script, and then back to the screen. He is sitting among a row of callers in Phone Room 4 on the seventh floor of a 1970s office building. He can hear conversations begin, the tone and speaking style vary, but the words are the same. The girl behind him, Chloe, is sweet and mouse-like, while next to her is an effervescent, unmistakably gay New Zealander called Craig. Chloe is Number 13 on the pledge chart, Craig Number 1. He trills and flirts unfailingly. He is a great caller and his pledge rate reflects this. Chloe, too, seems to win the hearts of the supporters, perhaps because she sounds just like the nice niece that every aunt wishes she had.

They are callers. Mike used to be Number One in the Phone Room 4 pledge chart. Not anymore.

‘Hello.’ Someone answers. “Good morning,” Mike begins enthusiastically, “my name is Michael Teller. Can I speak to Mrs…’ a momentary pause as he looks at the supporter name on the screen – ‘Audrey Tutt?”

“Yes, that’s me.” A frail, Scottish accent.

Mike repeats his name then the script takes over: “I am calling on behalf of The Schizophrenia Society. This is a great opportunity for us to make contact with our supporters and tell them about our important work on behalf of sufferers of schizophrenia and psychosis. Is this a convenient time for me to speak to you?”

“It’s a wee bit early but I suppose so.”

“Thank you. I will be as brief as I can.” Mike scans the call sheet to the next section – the Thank You. “The reason I am calling you today Mrs Tutt is because we want to let supporters know how much we recognise the tremendous work you have done for The Schizophrenic Society. It is only because of the work of supporters like yourself that we are able to help as many people as we do. So a very big thank you – it is very much appreciated.”

“Oh, okay.”

Mike continues. A moment’s hesitation could be fatal to his mission. He has the strange sensation that he is listening to himself speaking to Audrey. His voice has taken on a life of its own. He can hear himself change his tone from warm and inviting to serious and sober, as he focuses in on the suffering and desperate need of the charity’s beneficiaries.

“Our Outreach Liaison Officers visit people who have recently been diagnosed with Schizophrenia and offer them support and practical help as they come to terms with the challenges of their condition. Without that support, up to 70% of sufferers will find themselves sectioned under the Mental Health Act.…”

“My son has schizophrenia so I understand very well what it means. He’s in protected accommodation.”

Mike flips the page to the Interruptions section. He knows he must now listen, be attentive and respond sensitively to the supporter. “Well, then you really do understand how important it is for sufferers and their families get the help they need. We really feel it is important that we reach everyone who needs our support but currently that is not happening. That is why I am calling today as it is the regular income from our supporters that enables us to…”

“Look, I’m sure what you’re doing is very important, but I’m a pensioner and I already support quite a number of charities. I am happy to continue with doing things locally but I really can’t afford to make a monthly payment…”

It’s over to the Negotiation page: “Of course Mrs Tutt, we completely understand that a large regular payment is not something that everyone feels comfortable about committing too and we want to be sure that all our supporters can give in the way that suits them.” He moves seamlessly to the warm section about the vital care provided by the society before striking again with the Ask. “And in order to continue providing these kind of services to as many sufferers from schizophrenia as possible, even a small gift of £5 a month would enable us to help many more people. Would this be something you would feel comfortable with, Mrs Tutt?”

As I said, I’m happy with the support I provide already. Good luck!”

“Well thank you…” She was gone already.

No pledge, but it could have been worse. He closes the call, and waits for the next one.

“Hello, who is this?”

“Good morning,” he begins. “My name is Mike Teller. Can I speak to Mr Frank Wilson?”

“Yes. What do you want?”

He begins his introduction, getting as far as the first mention of the Schizophrenia Society, when Frank interrupts him. “Ah!” The name of the charity sparks a reaction. “Now, listen, I’ve been wanting to speak to you people.”

“Oh good, well, as I was saying…”

“No, wait a minute, I have something to say to you, so you listen to me. I have been on to your website, and I’ve read your annual accounts. I see that six of your directors are on more than £50,000 a year and your chief executive is paid £140,000!”

“I’m sorry to hear that Mr Wilson…”

“It’s an absolute disgrace and I never want you to call me again. Goodbye!”

Supporters do sometimes react negatively to the charity’s remuneration policies. Never mind. The best course of action, when a supporter is upset, is to remain polite and as soon as possible get out of the call. Mike is not flustered. This is something he has had to deal with many times before. He laughs to himself, then move on to the next call.

‘Call answered.’

‘Good morning, can I speak to Mr … Warwick Bannerman.’ Strange, there can’t be that many Warwick Bannermans out there. Never mind, proceed as normal.

‘This is Warwick.’

‘Good morning, my name is Mike Teller. I am calling on behalf of The Schizo- ’

“Mike,” says Bannerman, interrupting, ‘tell me, isn’t this a bit early to be calling people at home?’

‘Well, actually, we find this is often a really good time to talk to people.’

‘But it’s 5.30 in the morning.’

Silence. Mike is thrown. It can’t be. He came in for his normal morning shift starting at 10.

‘I am sorry Mr Bannerman, according to my clock here –‘ Mike glances at the computer clock ‘it’s…you are right, it’s 5.30am.’ Christ. What the hell…oh no, it’s happened again.

‘Mike, who do you work for?’

‘I am working on behalf of the Schizophrenia Society.’

‘Yes, yes of course. But are you a professional charity fundraiser? Who employs you?’

‘PFF.’

Another silence. Mike adds: ‘That’s People First Fundraising.’

‘I know who they are Mike, I’m a director of the company.’

‘Oh God, it’s you Warwick!’ Mike laughs nervously. ‘I can’t believe it. Are you a supporter of the society?’

‘What are you doing Mike?’

‘Making calls of course…’

‘Except PFF don’t call people at 5.30 in the morning. Are you in the phone room?’

‘Yes.’ Mike looks around but Chloe and Craig are no longer at their terminals.

‘How did you get on to the system?’

‘The usual way.’

‘You’ve been trained as a manager.’

‘Yes I have.’

‘So you switched it on yourself.’

Mike thinks for a minute. ‘Yes.’

‘Mike. This is very serious. You can’t just let yourself into the building and start calling supporters at 5 in the morning. If our charities find out about this, we’ll be finished.’

Mike was struggling now. He remembered that he had not slept last night. It was possible that he had become confused about the time.

‘I want you to stay there, Mike. I’m coming in.’ Bannerman was in his running gear, but he would take his vintage Citreon DS 21 Pallas. He had made the test call after seeing the remote security monitor flashing red, telling him someone was in the building out of hours. Mike Teller. His worst fucking nightmare. He could call the cops but it would be pointless. Elizabeth and the kids were asleep. He would deal with Mike himself.

‘Don’t worry Warwick, everything is fine here. Chloe and Craig are here too.’

‘What? Chloe and Craig? Look, just stay there will you. And please, please. Don’t make any more calls. Log out as soon as this call is over. Then wait for me.’

‘Of course, yes.’ Where were Chloe and Craig? It didn’t matter. May be he had imagined them. He could do that. Mike hated Warwick Bannerman. His phoney smile, skin drawn and pale, eyes always darting like a lizard’s. He was so thin and long, the thin white duke of charity fundraising. Warwick gave all the new callers a pep talk, about how much money they were raising for the charities, how they should never apologise to supporters about the work they were doing. But he never talked about how much money the callers were making for Warwick Bannerman. But Mike knew.

Bannerman drove at speed on the near empty roads. Now he remembers Mike Teller. Mike had been a great asset to PFF. He had made thousands for the charities since he began working for them. People like Mike Teller were what PFF was all about, and why it stood out from the rest of the fundraising sector. Warwick and his fellow directors knew how good the likes of Mike were at their jobs. But they also knew that most callers had a limited shelf life. They were like shooting stars, shining brightly, then just as quickly fading away.

Mike had been a top caller. Craig had even told Mike to slow down, to throw some pledges. They started calling him Slick Mick. He was getting three or four pledges an hour at one point. He was an actor, drama and English at Manchester. He was good, brilliant some said. He couldn’t help it if he didn’t suffer fools, and knew he was better than most of the talentless dullards who went into acting. Then came the breakdown at 26, the swirling tides of depression that crept up on him every time he thought he was cured. He was just recovering from the last bout of the black dog when he came to PFF. He started promisingly, using his actor’s voice, the ability to switch on the charm, to be engaged, even on a bad day bringing the script to life. You will like me and give me your money. He actually enjoyed it. Watching his pledges mount, rising up the pledge chart in Phone Room 4. The problem began when he reached Number One. There was only one way to go from there. Mike wasn’t good at losing. He began to feel moments of panic in the phone room. He would log off and go out on the stairwell to smoke a cigarette. The job had made him smoke again. It was the adrenaline, the need to keep up and outperform the other callers - the fear of losing. He began to resent People First Fundraisers. He even began to resent the charities. Frank had every right to be mad about the salaries of the charity directors. What about the patrons? The Duke of Westminster, the Prince of Wales, the people who owned the choicest real estate in the land. They could fund the charities themselves if they wanted to. Did they really care about the sufferers, the mentally ill and mad? Mike didn’t think so. In fact, Mike hated them and PFF. Warwick Bannerman and his six bedroom house, his beautiful Finnish wife and his vintage cars. When Mike was top of the caller table and a PFF star, Bannerman had come over and personally thanked him. But Mike could see through Bannerman. He knew. Bannerman was a salesman, a businessman. He didn’t give a fuck about the charities. He was the Devil.

Bannerman pulled into the basement car park. He buzzed himself in and headed for the lifts to take him to the seventh floor. He felt nervous. The place was empty. He had built this business up from scratch and he wasn’t going to let this failed actor psycho destroy it. But he would not show anger. That wasn’t his style. He would use his persuasive powers to get Mike to leave the building quietly. In fact he would act like everything was normal.

Mike made himself a coffee. He decided to make one last call. The call maker found a supporter from the database. ‘Hello,’ said an RP accented woman from Chiswick.

“Good morning. My name is Mike Teller. Can I speak to Mrs Chakrabarty.”

“Call me Aneesha.”

“Thank you …Aneesha. I am Mike Teller and I am calling on behalf of the Schizophrenia Society. Actually, I am calling from the offices of People First Fundraising. I am a charity fundraiser and this is my last call for PFF before I kiss this hell hole goodbye.’

‘I’m sorry? Is this some sort of prank call?”

‘I promise you Aneesha, this is the honest truth. I have made thousands of fundraising calls over the last year and I am…very good at it. I have raised a lot of money for charities but lately I have not been feeling …look, um, I know this probably doesn’t make a lot of sense but please, bear with me. I came in this morning to do my final shift. I have felt that I am manipulating people into giving me – giving PFF – their money. I call people during their dinner, or when they are on the loo or just getting out of the shower. I… I charm them and listen to their problems and I take their money. Anyway, I am not prepared to do that anymore.”

‘Mike, really, I am so sorry to hear that. I’ve done raffles for the Schizophrenia Society myself. My sister is a sufferer. Look…”

“I’m a maddie too. Thing is, I haven’t been taking my meds lately, and I’ve been hearing voices. God, what a cliché! I thought if I came into work just like the old days, may be they would stop.”

“Mike, I’m sorry I really have to go.”

“Of course.” He suddenly went into fundraiser mode. “Would you consider making a small, regular donation to the work of the society, say, £12 a month?”

“Okay, yes.” Aneesha sounded a bit desperate. Brilliant, Mike, you’re doing it again. You’ve manipulated her into giving money.

Mike completes the transaction on the system and says thank you. “Take care Mike,” says Aneesha, hanging up.

‘That was a great call Mike,’ says Bannerman, standing next to Mike in the phone room. His mouth is smiling but his eyes are like bullets.

‘Warwick, you’re here.’

Bannerman leans over, takes the mouse and pulls down the menu to log Mike off the Call Maker. ‘Even if we are manipulating people like you just said to Aneesha, is that such a bad thing?’

Mike rolls back in his swivel chair and turns away from Bannerman. “I think I better be going.’

‘I think you’re right.’

Mike puts on his jacket, picks up his satchel and walks towards the door to leave the phone room.

‘You better give me your pass Mike.’

Mike stops, takes the swab key from his pocket and offers it to Bannerman, who manages to peek inside Mike’s satchel as he turns. ‘What have you got in your bag, Mike?’

‘Just some private stuff.’

‘I thought I saw some PFF scripts.’

‘No.’

‘You know you can’t take those out of the building.’

Mike presses the exit button to release the door. His heart is racing. ‘Mike, can I have a look inside your bag please.’ Bannerman is behind him and lunges for the satchel. There is a struggle and Mike wrenches himself free, violently throwing Bannerman back toward the lifts. He pushes through the glass doors to the stairwell and begins to run down the wide concrete steps. He hears Bannerman shouting ‘Stop you nutter!’

Mike has often fantasised about taking the plunge from the stairwell. The thought of suicide somehow made sense in the middle of an endless shift at PFF. It’s a long drop from the seventh floor on to the street below. The dawn casts a slick grey light across the city. Mike thinks about all the fundraising scripts and the caller league tables in his bag and how much damage he could do to Warwick Bannerman if they were published. The world would then know PFF’s trade secrets, how it had been operating like the nasty sales business it actually was. But then he sees Bannerman coming towards him, arms outstretched and eyes like murder. ‘Fuck you Bannerman!’ he shouts as his boss tries to seize his bag. Mike grabs Bannerman’s left arm and twists it behind his back in a move he has practised many times on the matt at his weekly judo class, using the Devil’s weight to throw him over the concrete barrier into the sharp morning air. Bannerman flails wildly as he tries to stop himself falling. Finding a moment’s balance, he begins what is the most important Ask of his life, “Please Mike, don’t – I have two kids” – his voice is full of the urgency and fear brought on by the presentiment of his own death. “Please, I won’t tell anyone. You can just walk away.” Mike has him in an iron grip from behind. “Shut up.”

“I’m not afraid of dying, but my kids, my wife need me.”

Mike leans in and whispers: “I understand completely. That’s why it’s so important to us that you are comfortable with the level of your commitment to the last fucking seconds of your vile, hypocritical existence.” Mike pushes Bannerman over the edge. My God, he has actually killed me, thinks Bannerman, as the faces of Becky, Josh and Elizabeth blaze across his retina. Mike watches his long, lizard-like body coil and crash on to the pavement. “I can assure you Mr Bannerman, your family will be fine. The insurance will cover all eventualities. Finally, I just want to say thank you for everything you’ve done for me and the all the other sorry bastards who’ve ever worked for PFF. Goodbye.”

Mike feels oddly calm. He takes each flight of stairs in a single bound as if he is now charged with superhuman energy. He pushes open the gate and takes the steps down to the high street where shop workers will soon be arriving for the new day. In the crisp, cool morning it belongs to him and him alone.

Tuesday, 14 August 2012

9/11 insider trading led directly to the CIA's highest ranks - flashback

From Global Research CIA Executive Director "Buzzy" Krongard managed firm that handled "put" Options on United Airlines by Michael C. Ruppert

FTW Publications, 9 October 2001, Centre for Research on Globalisation, globalresearch.ca, 20 October 2001

Although uniformly ignored by the mainstream U.S. media, there is abundant and clear evidence that a number of transactions in financial markets indicated specific (criminal) foreknowledge of the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. That evidence also demonstrates that, in the case of at least one of these trades -- which has left a $2.5 million prize unclaimed -- the firm used to place the "put options" on United Airlines stock was, until 1998, managed by the man who is now in the number three Executive Director position at the Central Intelligence Agency. Until 1997 A.B. "Buzzy" Krongard had been Chairman of the investment bank A.B. Brown. A.B. Brown was acquired by Banker's Trust in 1997. Krongard then became, as part of the merger, Vice Chairman of Banker's Trust-AB Brown, one of 20 major U.S. banks named by Senator Carl Levin this year as being connected to money laundering. Krongard's last position at Banker's Trust (BT) was to oversee "private client relations." In this capacity he had direct hands-on relations with some of the wealthiest people in the world in a kind of specialized banking operation that has been identified by the U.S. Senate and other investigators as being closely connected to the laundering of drug money.

Krongard (re?) joined the CIA in 1998 as counsel to CIA Director George Tenet. He was promoted to CIA Executive Director by President Bush in March of 2001. Banker's Trust was acquired by Deutsche Bank in 1999. The combined firm is the single largest bank in Europe. And, as we shall see, Deutsche Bank played several key roles in events connected to the September 11 attacks.

The Scope of Known Insider Trading

Before looking further into these relationships it is necessary to look at the insider trading information that is being ignored by Reuters, The New York Times and other mass media. It is well documented that the CIA has long monitored such trades - in real time - as potential warnings of terrorist attacks and other economic moves contrary to U.S. interests. Previous stories in FTW have specifically highlighted the use of Promis software to monitor such trades.

It is necessary to understand only two key financial terms to understand the significance of these trades. "Selling Short" is the borrowing of stock, selling it at current market prices, but not being required to actually produce the stock for some time. If the stock falls precipitously after the short contract is entered, the seller can then fulfill the contract by buying the stock after the price has fallen and complete the contract at the pre-crash price. These contracts often have a window of as long as four months. "Put Options," purchased at nominal prices of, for example, $1.00 per share, are sold in blocks of 100 shares. If exercised, they give the holder the option of selling selected stocks at a future date at a price set when the contract is issued. Thus, for an investment of $10,000 it might be possible to tie up 10,000 shares of United or American Airlines at $100 per share, and the seller of the option is then obligated to buy them if the option is executed. If the stock has fallen to $50 when the contract matures, the holder of the option can purchase the shares for $50 and immediately sell them for $100 - regardless of where the market then stands.

A "call option" is the reverse of a put option, which is, in effect, a derivatives bet that the stock price will go up.

A September 21 story by the Israeli Herzliyya International Policy Institute for Counterterrorism, entitled "Black Tuesday: The World's Largest Insider Trading Scam?" documented the following trades connected to the September 11 attacks:

  • * Between September 6 and 7, the Chicago Board Options Exchange saw purchases of 4,744 put options on United Airlines, but only 396 call options... Assuming that 4,000 of the options were bought by people with advance knowledge of the imminent attacks, these "insiders" would have profited by almost $5 million.

    * On September 10, 4,516 put options on American Airlines were bought on the Chicago exchange, compared to only 748 calls. Again, there was no news at that point to justify this imbalance;... Again, assuming that 4,000 of these options trades represent "insiders," they would represent a gain of about $4 million.

    * [The levels of put options purchased above were more than six times higher than normal.]

    * No similar trading in other airlines occurred on the Chicago exchange in the days immediately preceding Black Tuesday.

    * Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., which occupied 22 floors of the World Trade Center, saw 2,157 of its October $45 put options bought in the three trading days before Black Tuesday; this compares to an average of 27 contracts per day before September 6. Morgan Stanley's share price fell from $48.90 to $42.50 in the aftermath of the attacks. Assuming that 2,000 of these options contracts were bought based upon knowledge of the approaching attacks, their purchasers could have profited by at least $1.2 million.

    * Merrill Lynch & Co., which occupied 22 floors of the World Trade Center, saw 12,215 October $45 put options bought in the four trading days before the attacks; the previous average volume in those shares had been 252 contracts per day [a 1200% increase!]. When trading resumed, Merrill's shares fell from $46.88 to $41.50; assuming that 11,000 option contracts were bought by "insiders," their profit would have been about $5.5 million.

    * European regulators are examining trades in Germany's Munich Re, Switzerland's Swiss Re, and AXA of France, all major reinsurers with exposure to the Black Tuesday disaster. [FTW Note: AXA also owns more than 25% of American Airlines stock making the attacks a "double whammy" for them.] On September 29, 2001 - in a vital story that has gone unnoticed by the major media - the San Francisco Chronicle reported, "Investors have yet to collect more than $2.5 million in profits they made trading options in the stock of United Airlines before the Sept. 11, terrorist attacks, according to a source familiar with the trades and market data.

    "The uncollected money raises suspicions that the investors - whose identities and nationalities have not been made public - had advance knowledge of the strikes." They don't dare show up now. The suspension of trading for four days after the attacks made it impossible to cash-out quickly and claim the prize before investigators started looking.

    "... October series options for UAL Corp. were purchased in highly unusual volumes three trading days before the terrorist attacks for a total outlay of $2,070; investors bought the option contracts, each representing 100 shares, for 90 cents each. [This represents 230,000 shares]. Those options are now selling at more than $12 each. There are still 2,313 so-called "put" options outstanding [valued at $2.77 million and representing 231,300 shares] according to the Options Clearinghouse Corp."

    "...The source familiar with the United trades identified Deutsche Bank Alex. Brown, the American investment banking arm of German giant Deutsche Bank, as the investment bank used to purchase at least some of these options..."

    As reported in other news stories, Deutsche Bank was also the hub of insider trading activity connected to Munich Re. just before the attacks.

    CIA, the Banks and the Brokers

    Understanding the interrelationships between CIA and the banking and brokerage world is critical to grasping the already frightening implications of the above revelations. Let's look at the history of CIA, Wall Street and the big banks by looking at some of the key players in CIA's history. Clark Clifford - The National Security Act of 1947 was written by Clark Clifford, a Democratic Party powerhouse, former Secretary of Defense, and one-time advisor to President Harry Truman. In the 1980s, as Chairman of First American Bancshares, Clifford was instrumental in getting the corrupt CIA drug bank BCCI a license to operate on American shores. His profession: Wall Street lawyer and banker.

    John Foster and Allen Dulles - These two brothers "designed" the CIA for Clifford. Both were active in intelligence operations during WW II. Allen Dulles was the U.S. Ambassador to Switzerland where he met frequently with Nazi leaders and looked after U.S. investments in Germany. John Foster went on to become Secretary of State under Dwight Eisenhower and Allen went on to serve as CIA Director under Eisenhower and was later fired by JFK. Their professions: partners in the most powerful - to this day - Wall Street law firm of Sullivan, Cromwell.

    Bill Casey - Ronald Reagan's CIA Director and OSS veteran who served as chief wrangler during the Iran-Contra years was, under President Richard Nixon, Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission. His profession: Wall Street lawyer and stockbroker.

    David Doherty - The current Vice President of the New York Stock Exchange for enforcement is the retired General Counsel of the Central Intelligence Agency.

    George Herbert Walker Bush - President from 1989 to January 1993, also served as CIA Director for 13 months from 1976-7. He is now a paid consultant to the Carlyle Group, the 11th largest defense contractor in the nation, and which shares joint investments with the bin Laden family.

    A.B. "Buzzy" Krongard - The current Executive Director of the Central Intelligence Agency is the former Chairman of the investment bank A.B. Brown and former Vice Chairman of Banker's Trust.

    John Deutch - This retired CIA Director from the Clinton Administration currently sits on the board at Citigroup, the nation's second largest bank, which has been repeatedly and overtly involved in the documented laundering drug money. This includes Citigroup's 2001 purchase of a Mexican bank known to launder drug money, Banamex.

    Nora Slatkin - This retired CIA Executive Director also sits on Citibank's board.

    Maurice "Hank" Greenburg - The CEO of AIG insurance, manager of the third largest capital investment pool in the world, was floated as a possible CIA Director in 1995. FTW exposed Greenberg's and AIG's long connection to CIA drug trafficking and covert operations in a two-part series that was interrupted just prior to the attacks of September 11. AIG's stock has bounced back remarkably well since the attacks. To read that story, please go to http://www.copvcia.com/stories/part_2.html.

    One wonders how much damning evidence is necessary to respond to what is now irrefutable proof that CIA knew about the attacks and did not stop them. Whatever our government is doing, whatever the CIA is doing, it is clearly NOT in the interests of the American people, especially those who died on September 11.

    The original URL of this article is: http://globalresearch.ca/articles/RUP110A.html

    Copyright, 2001, Michael C. Ruppert and FTW Publications at http://www.copvcia.com.

  • Monday, 13 August 2012

    Göbekli Tepe - the mystery of humanity's first 'temple'

    On the Turkish side of the Turkish-Syrian border, now the site of the escalating conflict taking place in Syria, where refugees, rebels and foreign intelligence agencies are gathering, there is a little known archeological site that holds the key to humankind's past and the emergence of complex societies. Göbekli Tepe is the world's oldest temple - predating Stone Henge - and writing - by at least 6000 years. Moreover, the startling carvings in stone are far more sophisticated than those at Stone Henge and the site much, much larger. The archeological site covers about 22 acres and is made up of at least 20 great stone rings, one of which is 65 feet across. Exact numbers are uncertain because much of the site is still underground, but some 50 huge pillars have already been uncovered. The tallest pillars are 18 feet in height and weigh approximately 16 tons. Most are carved into the shape of a capital T and almost all of them are covered in a bas-relief menagerie of animals.
    Excavations will take many years as they only began in earnest a few years ago. This mysterious site was deliberately covered over with flint, as if somebody wanted to preserve it for posterity. The archeologists working there, led by Klaus Schmidt, who first visited the site in 1994, are convinced it shows that its socio-religious purpose predates the settled agriculture that grew up nearby hundreds of years later. This has profound significance - it means the people who built Göbekli Tepe first built this remarkable complex because of their religious or spiritual beliefs, and only then developed agriculture to support their work as temple builders. The area was extremely fertile, like a garden of Eden.
    It was always assumed that the workforce required to construct a megalithic stone circle could not be organized until human society had reached the village stage of development in the early Neolithic. Gobekli Tepi confounds this view. Most stone pillars at Göbekli Tepe weigh 10 to 20 tons, the largest are 50 tons and the most distant quarry was 500m distant. The stone T-shaped monoliths are 3m high, although the one in the center of each circle is taller. Read more at http://www.environmentalgraffiti.com/offbeat-news/mystery-deliberate-burial-ancient-megalithic-stone-circles/9949#vUfL4cVj9mMkGAyC.99 As The Smithsonian wrote: .
    "This area was like a paradise," says Klaus Schmidt, a member of the German Archaeological Institute. Indeed, Gobekli Tepe sits at the northern edge of the Fertile Crescent—an arc of mild climate and arable land from the Persian Gulf to present-day Lebanon, Israel, Jordan and Egypt—and would have attracted hunter-gatherers from Africa and the Levant. And partly because Schmidt has found no evidence that people permanently resided on the summit of Gobekli Tepe itself, he believes this was a place of worship on an unprecedented scale—humanity's first "cathedral on a hill." ...In rapid-fire German he explains that he has mapped the entire summit using ground-penetrating radar and geomagnetic surveys, charting where at least 16 other megalith rings remain buried across 22 acres. The one-acre excavation covers less than 5 percent of the site. He says archaeologists could dig here for another 50 years and barely scratch the surface. ..... Gobekli Tepe's builders were on the verge of a major change in how they lived, thanks to an environment that held the raw materials for farming. "They had wild sheep, wild grains that could be domesticated—and the people with the potential to do it," Schmidt says. In fact, research at other sites in the region has shown that within 1,000 years of Gobekli Tepe's construction, settlers had corralled sheep, cattle and pigs. And, at a prehistoric village just 20 miles away, geneticists found evidence of the world's oldest domesticated strains of wheat; radiocarbon dating indicates agriculture developed there around 10,500 years ago, or just five centuries after Gobekli Tepe's construction. To Schmidt and others, these new findings suggest a novel theory of civilization. Scholars have long believed that only after people learned to farm and live in settled communities did they have the time, organization and resources to construct temples and support complicated social structures. But Schmidt argues it was the other way around: the extensive, coordinated effort to build the monoliths literally laid the groundwork for the development of complex societies. The immensity of the undertaking at Gobekli Tepe reinforces that view. Schmidt says the monuments could not have been built by ragged bands of hunter-gatherers. To carve, erect and bury rings of seven-ton stone pillars would have required hundreds of workers, all needing to be fed and housed. Hence the eventual emergence of settled communities in the area around 10,000 years ago. "This shows sociocultural changes come first, agriculture comes later," says Stanford University archaeologist Ian Hodder, who excavated Catalhoyuk, a prehistoric settlement 300 miles from Gobekli Tepe. "You can make a good case this area is the real origin of complex Neolithic societies." Read more: http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history-archaeology/gobekli-tepe.html#ixzz23RQhzF7u
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6bekli_Tepe

    Friday, 10 August 2012

    The abolition of work

    LLLindustryind

    As this brilliantly referenced article argues, one of the most fundamental changes that is taking place in the economy is the gradual reduction in productive activity as a proportion of what we call 'work'. As first agriculture, and now industry, becomes automated, less and less people are required to produce the goods which support the subsistence of the population. This paradox is not a widely discussed phenomenon, probably because it raises tough questions about what sort of economy we need or want.
    The writer, Bob Black, is something of a provocateur since he lumps conservatives, Marxists, anarchists and feminists together as conspiring to keep us working to the grave, albeit for different classes of boss. Beneath the rhetoric, though, he has a serious point to make. Perhaps the future will see humans mainly engaged in 'play' (or art or creative work) as he claims, or engaged in a gift economy as advocated by Charles Eisenstein, Nipun Mehta and many feminists. Fundamentally the gift economy involves giving without expecting anything in return - the latter is called exchange and is fundamental to capitalism. The gift economy is what humans used for millennia, and is typical of nomadic and subsistence societies. I was in France on holiday recently and noticed how the French, rather like the British, are not very good at interacting with children. This contrasts with the way people in Asian societies and in Latin America are very receptive to the presence of children. The gift economy is rather like what happens in a family which is supportive without necessarily expecting anything in return. This is most obvious in the case of parents and their children. It struck me that in societies that have not been thoroughly indoctrinated in capitalism, nurture is a more natural reaction, as is giving and hospitality. This applies to children and strangers -as I have witnessed in my travels around the world. In countries with a capitalist or imperialist tradition, such as  France and the UK, nurture has been bred out of us, hence the awkward response to other people's children. In other cultures children are invariably received with joy by both sexes and all ages - I saw this in Vietnam and the Middle East, and Ireland.

    Capitalism is defined by scarcity, wage labour, the capital (financial) market, and private property. The difficulty we are facing now is that by virtue of rising productivity in sectors such as agriculture and industry, we have created abundance and an ever increasing surplus of necessary labour. Wage labour works in an economy based on scarcity but not in one in which abundance/high productivity is the norm. Of course, we have created all kinds of new 'jobs' to keep people busy appropriating surplus for their companies, but if you examine what those jobs entail, you will see that they only serve the superstructure of capitalism. Marketing, administration, communication, security etc. These do not directly supply the things we need. Rather, they support the social structure of the existing private property and consumption based society. They are not fundamentally 'useful' - as in providing things that we can use.

    This problem will not go away, even if the powers that be can get us out of this crisis. There are useful things that people can do such as provide health, education, social services, the arts - all of them in their own way acts of human giving rather than production. But as long as we are caught in the scarcity-exchange-wage-monetisation paradigm, the dysfunction of continuing with the capitalist system will become more and more obvious, especially in advanced economies. The transition will take decades, even centuries. After all, the first shareholding companies were developed over 400 years ago in Holland and England for international trade. Capitalism is still relatively young and yet we still have remnants of feudalism 400 years later.

    At the level of capital, in its most productive phase, capital is invested in productive activity including commercial agriculture and new technology goods. In the recent neoliberal phase more and more capital is concentrated in rent seeking - this is both in the financial and non-financial sector. Essentially large companies take a rent from the provision of products such as energy, housing, and loan capital. This is essentially the extraction of value from the economy, rather than the creation of value. It signifies stagnation and crisis. Also, as manufacturing is automated, there is less surplus value to be taken and so capital must look elsewhere for profit. This not only leads to financialisation of capital, as witnessed prior to the 2008 crash in western markets. It also presents a problem for traditional marxists, in that as industrial capital declines, so does the relative weight of the traditional working class. Most people end up in the informal sector or in 'middle class' jobs. Thus we see in recent unrest and revolutions, the preponderance of middle class and student agitation, notwithstanding a role for working class protest in Europe and elsewhere against austerity. However this hardly means the 'end' of the working class - that class has never been larger, and is concentrated in developing countries, especially Asia.

    Looking to the future, private personal property may survive in a post work economy, as against corporate property which should take on new social forms. As for wage labour, it should decline over time as the main form of economic activity and will go the way of serfdom and slavery. All those who no longer work for a fixed number of hours a week for a corporate entity are already on their way to some kind of freedom.

    Wikileaks reveals true scale of Colombian slaughter - 250,000


    by DANIEL KOVALIK
    For years, it has been believed that Guatemala led the Hemisphere in mass slaughter in the modern era, with 200,000 victims in the 1980s – about 94% of them at the hands of the U.S.-backed state and its death squad allies. Very sadly, it appears that Colombia has shattered that record, and, as Wikileaks reveals, the U.S. is quite aware of this.
    Thus, in a November 19, 2009 U.S. Embassy Cable, entitled, “2009-2010 International Narcotics Control Strategy Report,” the U.S. Embassy in Bogota acknowledges, as a mere aside, the horrific truth: 257,089 registered victims of the right-wing paramilitaries.  And, as Human Rights Watch just reported in its 2012 annual report on Colombia, these paramilitaries continue to work hand-in-glove with the U.S.-supported Colombian military.
    Even for those of us deeply involved in Colombia, this figure is staggering.  The only time I saw such a figure before was in a book (Cocaine, Death Squads, and the War on Terror) which I recently reviewed on this site, and which cites one independent journalist for the claim that around 250,000 victims have been killed by the Colombian para-state.  This book further claims that this number has been artificially lowered through mass graves and Nazi-style crematoria.
    It appears now that the U.S. has been quite aware of this death toll for over two years, though this knowledge has done nothing to change U.S. policy toward Colombia — which is slated to receive over $500 million in military and police aid from the U.S. in the next two years — and certainly did nothing to prevent the Obama Administration from seeking and gaining passage of the Colombia Free Trade Agreement last year.
    And, much like Guatemala in the 1980’s, the violence in Colombia falls disproportionately on the indigenous population – another fact acknowledged by the U.S. Embassy in cables released by Wikileaks.   Moreover, this anti-indigenous violence is escalating.  Indeed, as the U.S. Embassy acknowledges in a February 26, 2010 Embassy Cable entitled, “Violence Against Indigenous Shows Upward Trend,” such violence is pushing 34 indigenous groups to the point of extinction.  This violence, therefore, can only be described as genocidal.
    This 2010 cable explains that, “for the second consecutive year killings of indigenous increased,” with a 50% increase (to 106 killings) from 2008 to 2009.  The cable further explains that “[o]ther indicators of violence against indigenous also worsened in 2009.  According to ONIC [The National Indigenous Organization of Colombia], displacement rose by 20% (3,212 to 3,649), forced disappearance by over 100% (7 to 18), and threats by 3000% (10 to 314).  ONIC also reported an increase in forced recruitment of minors by all illegal armed groups, but did not provide an estimated number of cases.”
    Moreover, while the Embassy explains that the left-wing FARC, by its own admission, was responsible for some of the violence against indigenous, the Embassy also acknowledges that it is the Colombian state and its paramilitary allies which are chiefly to blame for this violence.
    Thus, the Embassy, relying on a study by anthropologist Esther Sanchez – a study itself funded by the U.S. government – notes that the militaries and the paramilitaries target the indigenous because they “often perceive indigenous as FARC collaborators because they co-exist on their territories”; and that it is the Colombian military’s very presence on indigenous land which “’brings the conflict to the backyard of the indigenous,’” thereby putting their lives and very existence at risk.   Still, the Embassy scoffs at the notion that the Colombian military should leave indigenous territory, characterizing this very request by the Awa indigenous tribe as “impractical.”
    And, this is “impractical,” the Embassy forthrightly explains, because that territory must be captured for its vast resource wealth.  To wit, the U.S. Embassy explicitly acknowledges that “capital investments in the mining of hydrocarbons sectors” as well as “investments in rubber [and] palm oil” – that is, the very investments which U.S. military policy and the Free Trade Agreement are designed to promote – are leading directly to violence against indigenous persons.  This is so, the Embassy relates, because the indigenous peoples “are unlikely to abandon land which is considered sacred to their cultural identity.”   That is, they will not make way for capital exploitation voluntarily.
    All of this reveals that the U.S. and Colombia continue to press forward with both military and economic policies which the U.S. itself recognizes are leading to genocide.  Indeed, as the U.S. Embassy itself recognizes, genocide is truly necessary for these policies to be carried out.
    This puts a lie to any claims that the U.S. is interested in human rights.  Indeed, as the U.S. is poised to exclude Cuba from the Summit of the Americas on human rights grounds, it is the country hosting this Summit – Colombia – which, by any objective account, should be singled out for its uniquely bad human rights policies.  In truth, the U.S. itself, which is propping up Colombia’s brutal regime, should also be so singled out.  However, because the U.S. runs the world, this too would seem to be “impractical.”
    Daniel Kovalik writing for Counterpunch

    Tuesday, 7 August 2012

    Gore Vidal 1925-2012 - supporter of 9/11 truth



    The great American writer and critic Gore Vidal died aged 86 last week. In the obituaries of his remarkable career as a writer and friend of JFK and his family, a few mentioned his views on the events of 9/11. Vidal wrote a remarkable piece outlining the evidence for US - and Pakistani - involvement in the attacks in 2002. It was printed in The Observer. As Vidal wrote, conspiracy theory has become short hand in the mainstream media for unspeakable truth. Some things are literally unspeakable, and it takes a fearless tribune to speak them.

    Here is an interview with Vidal from 2005 in which he supports the work of investigators pointing to Bush administration complicity in the attacks. Vidal was able to get the evidence of 9/11 being a false flag operation into the mainstream media, if only briefly, thanks to his high profile. Here is an extract from The Observer, 2002:

    Vidal's highly controversial 7000 word polemic titled 'The Enemy Within' - published in the print edition of The Observer today - argues that what he calls a 'Bush junta' used the terrorist attacks as a pretext to enact a pre-existing agenda to invade Afghanistan and crack down on civil liberties at home.
    Vidal writes: 'We still don't know by whom we were struck that infamous Tuesday, or for what true purpose. But it is fairly plain to many civil libertarians that 9/11 put paid not only to much of our fragile Bill of Rights but also to our once-envied system of government which had taken a mortal blow the previous year when the Supreme Court did a little dance in 5/4 time and replaced a popularly elected President with the oil and gas Bush-Cheney junta.'
    Vidal argues that the real motive for the Afghanistan war was to control the gateway to Eurasia and Central Asia's energy riches. He quotes extensively from a 1997 analysis of the region by Zgibniew Brzezinski, formerly national security adviser to President Carter, in support of this theory. But, Vidal argues, US administrations, both Democrat and Republican, were aware that the American public would resist any war in Afghanistan without a truly massive and widely perceived external threat.
    'Osama was chosen on aesthetic grounds to be the frightening logo for our long-contemplated invasion and conquest of Afghanistan ... [because] the administration is convinced that Americans are so simple-minded that they can deal with no scenario more complex than the venerable, lone, crazed killer (this time with zombie helpers) who does evil just for the fun of it 'cause he hates us because we're rich 'n free 'n he's not.' Vidal also attacks the American media's failure to discuss 11 September and its consequences: 'Apparently, "conspiracy stuff" is now shorthand for unspeakable truth.'
    'It is an article of faith that there are no conspiracies in American life. Yet, a year or so ago, who would have thought that most of corporate America had been conspiring with accountants to cook their books since - well, at least the bright dawn of the era of Reagan and deregulation.'
    At the heart of the essay are questions about the events of 9/11 itself and the two hours after the planes were hijacked. Vidal writes that 'astonished military experts cannot fathom why the government's "automatic standard order of procedure in the event of a hijacking" was not followed'.
    These procedures, says Vidal, determine that fighter planes should automatically be sent aloft as soon as a plane has deviated from its flight plan. Presidential authority is not required until a plane is to be shot down. But, on 11 September, no decision to start launching planes was taken until 9.40am, eighty minutes after air controllers first knew that Flight 11 had been hijacked and fifty minutes after the first plane had struck the North Tower.
    'By law, the fighters should have been up at around 8.15. If they had, all the hijacked planes might have been diverted and shot down.'
    Vidal asks why Bush, as Commander-in-Chief, stayed in a Florida classroom as news of the attacks broke: 'The behaviour of President Bush on 11 September certainly gives rise to not unnatural suspicions.' He also attacks the 'nonchalance' of General Richard B Myers, acting Joint Chief of Staff, in failing to respond until the planes had crashed into the twin towers.
    Asking whether these failures to act expeditiously were down to conspiracy, coincidence or error, Vidal notes that incompetence would usually lead to reprimands for those responsible, writing that 'It is interesting how often in our history, when disaster strikes, incompetence is considered a better alibi than .... Well, yes, there are worse things.'
    Vidal draws comparisons with another 'day of infamy' in American history, writing that 'The truth about Pearl Harbour is obscured to this day. But it has been much studied. 11 September, it is plain, is never going to be investigated if Bush has anything to say about it.' He quotes CNN reports that Bush personally asked Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle to limit Congressional investigation of the day itself, ostensibly on grounds of not diverting resources from the anti-terror campaign.
    Vidal calls bin Laden an 'Islamic zealot' and 'evil doer' but argues that 'war' cannot be waged on the abstraction of 'terrorism'. He says that 'Every nation knows how - if it has the means and will - to protect itself from thugs of the sort that brought us 9/11 ... You put a price on their heads and hunt them down. In recent years, Italy has been doing that with the Sicilian Mafia; and no-one has suggested bombing Palermo.'
    Vidal also highlights the role of American and Pakistani intelligence in creating the fundamentalist terrorist threat: 'Apparently, Pakistan did do it - or some of it' but with American support. "From 1979, the largest covert operation in the history of the CIA was launched in response to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan ... the CIA covertly trained and sponsored these warriors.'

    Flight 77 passenger list - the Pentagon connections

    This is an extract from LetsRollForums on the bizarre military connections, mostly Navy, projectile and guidance systems, with strong Pentagon links, who happened to be Flight 77 which hit the Pentagon. Flight 77 is possibly the strangest element of the 9/11 events. How odd that at least 20 out of 53 passengers, more than a third, have such coincidental links to the technologies and DoD programmes that would be used for flight control, or be connected to the Bush administration? Coincidence? The most thorough listing of the passengers I can find is this one from Killtown

    Many are the inconsistencies concerning Flight AA77 which allegedly struck the Pentagon at 9:37 a.m. on September 11, 2001. We will not enumerate them here; other articles on this site already provide a detailed list of them. But new elements have recently emerged, resulting from investigations carried out by independent journalists. We reproduce below an extract from Strategie per una guerra mondiale, a book by Pino Cabras. It brings to light the inordinate proportion of passengers on board Flight 77 who had ties with the military sector and who were officially reported dead on September 11, 2001 at the Pentagon. 

    The Voltaire Network article dealing with the cockpit door of Flight 77 - which revealed disturbing details, little if at all examined by the official investigations, but which call for a closer look even by non-official investigations - had already drawn our attention to a certain number of the anomalies linked to that terrible day. The baffling profile of Charles F. Burlingame is but one anomaly. On board Flight 77 there was a high density of passengers who worked at classified positions in the Defense sector: between 16 and 21 persons out of a total of 58 (including 4 hijackers who were not listed in the flight manifests).

    The majority were aerospace engineers. One of them, Mr. Yamnicky, who worked in that capacity for the Veridian Corp., was a longtime CIA operative. Another passenger on the list, Mr. Caswell, led a team of about one hundred scientists for the US Navy. Others worked for Boeing and Raytheon in El Segundo, California, on a project dubbed Black Hawk.

    We present here some information regarding these noteworthy Flight 77 passengers, who belong to the lists which were obtained by scanning the obituary columns on the Web or in newspaper articles published in the days following the attacks.

    1. John D. Yamnicky Sr., 71, from Waldorf (Maryland), was on a business trip on American Airlines Flight 77. He was a retired naval aviator, who retired as Captain in 1979 when he joined Veridian Corp., a Virginia-based military contractor, where he worked on fighter aircraft and air-to-air missile programmes. His son, John Yamnicky, said his father worked on the development of the F/A-18 fighter jet. After graduating from the U.S. Naval Academy in 1952, John Yamnicky Sr. became a Navy test pilot, flying an A-4 attack plane and would sometimes tell stories of his travels and Navy service in Korea and Vietnam. "He crash-landed five times and walked away from them each," said Cindy Sharpley, a friend of the family. "But not this last one." (AP, 2001) He graduated from the Navy Test Pilot School at Patuxent River in 1960 and also obtained a Master's Degree in international relations from George Washington University in 1966. He was promoted to Captain in 1971; he spent years on bases and aircraft carriers, first as a naval aviator, then as director of the U.S. Naval Test Pilot School at the Patuxent River Naval Air Station in Maryland and finally as a manager of various aircraft and weapons programmes for the Department of Defense.
    2. William E. Caswell, born in Boston (Massachusetts) in 1947, was a third-generation physicist whose work at the Navy was so classified that his family knew very little about what he did each day. They don't even know exactly why he was headed to Los Angeles on the doomed American Airlines Flight 77. "It was a trip he often took," said his mother, Jean Caswell. "We never knew what he was doing there because he couldn't say. You just learn not to ask questions."2
      In a Princeton University publication, his thesis director stated that, in the 80's, when he learned that the US Navy was looking for a scientific expert for a classified project involving advanced technology, he submitted Bill Caswell's name. "I didn't take part in his daily work, although on all counts it was still related to his thesis : in no time he climbed to a top post to head a team of more than one hundred researchers in one of the most exacting branches of the US Navy." His technical and managerial skills were appreciated by all his colleagues and earned him the highest rewards and distinctions from the U.S. Navy. In a twist of fate, it was precisely for this project that he was travelling on Flight AA77 and ultimately perished in the crash.
    3. Wilson Falor "Bud" Flagg, 63, born in Millwood (Virginia), was a Rear Admiral in the US Navy and a pilot for American Airlines until his retirement. He was one of the three admirals censored by the US Navy in the context of the Tailhook conference scandal in 1991, relating to acts of sexual violence.
    4. His wife Darleen, also 63, died in the crash with him. The Tailhook incident effectively ended his further advancement and prompted him to leave the Navy to join American Airlines. According to his nephew Ray Sellek, Flagg continued to pay frequent visits to the Pentagon to provide technical advice, and even had an office there.
    5. Stanley Hall, 68, was from Rancho Palos Verde (California). He was director of programme management for Raytheon Electronics Warfare. "He was our dean of electronic warfare", explained one his colleagues at Raytheon, a Defense Department supplier. Hall had developed and fine-tuned antiradar technologies. He was a sober and competent man, somewhat of a paternal figure. "Many of our young engineers considered him their mentor", declared Raytheon's spokesperson Ron Colman.
    6. Bryan C. Jack, 48, from Alexandria (Virginia), was responsible for crunching America's defense budget. He headed the Pentagon's programming and fiscal economics division. He was on his way to California to teach a course at the Naval Postgraduate School. His colleagues said he was a brilliant mathematician and top budget analyst. He had worked at the Pentagon for 23 years. Jack had married artist Barbara Rachko in June 2001. She worked all week in her New York studio and they would only see each other on weekends, either at their Alexandria house or at their New York appartment. Barbara Rachko is a licensed commercial pilot and worked seven years as a naval officer. She was no longer on active duty but still served as US Navy reserve commander.
    7. Keller, Chandler 'Chad' Raymond. Chad was born in Manhattan Beach (California) on October 8, 1971. He was an eminent engineer specialized in propulsion technologies and project manager at Boeing Satellite Systems.3
    8. Dong Lee, 48, from Leesburg (Virginia), worked for Boeing Co. as an engineer.
    9. Ruben Ornedo, 39, from Los Angeles (California), was a propulsion engineer at the Boeing Comany in El Segundo (California).
    10. Robert Penninger, 63, from Poway (California), worked as an electrical engineer for BAE systems, a Defense Department supplier.
    11. Robert R. Ploger III, 59, from Annandale (Virginia), was a software architect at Lockheed Martin Corp.
    12. His wife Zandra Cooper.
    13. John Sammartino, 37, from Annandale (Virginia), was technical manager at XonTech Inc. in Arlington (Virginia), a research and development firm linked to the military sector and specialized in defense missiles and sensor technologies. It was bought in 2003 by Northrop Grumman, another company that produces for the military. The holder of an AA Platinum card, Sammartino was an assiduous traveller and was headed for Los Angeles to attend a conference at the Van Nuys company, together with his colleage Leonard Taylor. After graduating from University, Sammartino had been hired as an engineer by the Naval Research Lab ; he had worked for XonTech Inc. for 11 years.
    14. Leonard Taylor, 44, was technical group manager at XonTech Inc. He was born in Pasadena (California) and lived in Reston (Virginia). He graduated from Andover High School in 1975 and from Worcester Polytechnic Institute in 1979.4
    15. Vicky Yancey, 43, from Springfield (Virginia), was going to attend a business meeting in Reno, but hadn't planned to be on Flight AA77. Yancey, a former naval electronics technician, worked for the Vredenburg company, a Defense Department supplier. She had intended to leave Washington earlier but her departure was delayed due to a ticket problem, as her husband explained to the Washington Post. She called her husband ten minutes after boarding to let him know that she had finally managed to get a seat on the flight.5
    16. Charles F. Burlingame III, 52, graduated from the U.S. Naval Academy in 1971 ; he was flight commander of AA Flight 77. Burlingame was a naval reserve officer and had even worked in the Pentagon wing that was struck by the plane [according to the official version, Note by the editor].
    17. Barbara K. Olson, 45, was a conservative lawyer and commentator. She was known to television viewers as a self-assured, politically active journalist who represented the conservative mindset. In the Washington social and political landscape, she and her husband, Theodore B. Olson, formed a very influential couple. Theodore Olson was a high-profile lawyer who had successfully defended George W. Bush's disputed Florida election before the Supreme Court. President Bush named Olson to the post of US Attorney General, entrusting him with the responsibility of shaping the Administration's strategy vis-à-vis US courts.
      The story of the telephone call is indeed very odd. Mr. Olson claimed that while he was in his office at the Department of Justice on Tuesday morning, he received a call from his wife allegedly made from a cell phone on board flight AA77 to tell him that the plane had been hijacked. This version was reprobated considering that it was impossible to use a cell phone from a plane. In a subsequent, modified version Barbara Olson was supposed to have used a passenger seat-phone. But as reported in another Voltaire Network article, there is no record of any such call. Married for 4 years, the Olsons were perfectly complementary in terms of style. As a television commentator, she was the more outspoken of the two, while he kept a low profile in consonance with his role as a constitutional lawyer in charge of the Republican establishment. Barbara Olson was one of Bill and Hillary Clinton's most relentless critics, against whom she conducted merciless investigations. Among other things, she wrote a book titled Hell to Pay (Regnery 1999), in which she disparages Hillary Clinton, followed by another one titled Final Days (Regnery, 2001), which was published posthumously.6
    18. Karen Kincaid, 40, from Washington D.C. A native of Iowa, she was a lawyer with the Washington firm of Wiley Rein & Fielding, specializing in communications legislation. She was on her way to Los Angeles to attend a conference on the wireless communications industry. With her husband of five years, Peter Batacan, also a lawyer working for another firm, Kincaid was training to take part in the upcoming Marine Corps Marathon scheduled for October 28. Wiley Rein & Fielding is a powerful legal outift working for the Republican camp, that was involved in the vast legal action that helped Bush and Cheney overcome the controversial period of the post-2000 elections and which constituted an essential tool for the defense of "white collar" criminal cases.
    19. Steven 'Jake' Jacoby, 43, was a vice president and chief operating officer of a paging and wireless messaging service called Metrocall Inc., based in Alexandria (Virginia), which ranks as the second largest paging company in the United States. "The fact that Metrocall's technical operating network continued to function and provide critical communications during this horrific event was a tribute to Jake", said Co-worker Vice Kelly, Chief Financial Officer. In his last positon, Jacoby supervised the development of a multiple-frequency wireless messaging system for emergency worker and medical field use. It was Metrocall that supplied the equipment used by emergency responders who were on the scene in New York and Washington on 9/11.
    20. Bernard Brown Jr., 11, of Washington, D.C., student at Leckie Elementary School in Washington. He was embarking on an educational trip to the Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary near Santa Barbara, California, as part of a program funded by the National Geographic Society. His father, Bernard Sr., is a Navy chief petty officer who's works at the Pentagon and who's office is in the wing where the crash happened. Bernard took a rare day off to play golf on 9/11. Had he not — he would have been in his office at the Pentagon when the plane slammed in at 9:43. Is it just the strangest of strange coincidences that Bernard Jr.'s dad gave a lecture to him about death and dying the morning of his plane trip, took a "rare day off" that day from his office at the Pentagon, and that his son's hijacked flight "crashed" in the very spot that his office was in? His father, a Navy chief petty officer, says he sat his son down on the morning of Sept. 11, and had a serious talk with him about dangers he might encounter on the trip. "To be honest — totally honest — we talked about death," he says. "And I just told him, 'Don’t be afraid.' Just because the events that they were going to do were pretty dangerous. Just listen to what the people tell you, and the instructions, you'll be all right. You'll be fine. He said 'Daddy, I’m scared,' and I said, 'hey, don’t be scared, don’t be afraid to die. Because we all are going to die someday.’" Bernard’s mom Sinata Brown went to work. Her husband Bernard took a rare day off to play golf. Had he not — he would have been in his office at the Pentagon when the plane slammed in at 9:43. Tragically, his own son’s memorial is not the only one Bernard Brown expects to attend. That’s because Flight 77 — the flight carrying Bernard Brown’s son — actually crashed into the wing of the Pentagon where he works. Few of his colleagues survived. "One of my best friends, a guy who worked for me, a girl who was a training officer," says Bernard. "Everybody on that, you know, people that worked in my area, everybody, all the Navy personnel probably except for two or three I knew on that list. So, out of 30 something, how many that were in there, I knew every last one of them." - MSN (09/25/01)
    Additional remarks by Thierry Meyssan

    When I was in Tehran in September 2002, I had the opportunity to discuss in depth the events of September 11 with Hussein Shariatmadari, Director of the Kheyan press agency and spokesperson for the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution. It was my first encounter with someone who had such a detailed knowledge of the events. We continued our discussion until late in the day.

    On this occasion, he shared with me the investigative findings of his associates. They had pursued the same hypothesis as the one advanced by Pino Cabras, but with far greater means at their disposal. They had constituted biographical profiles for each of the passengers on all four planes. Their findings showed that 75% of the passengers had connections with the Pentagon, not only on flight AA77 but also on all the other flights.
    1. September 11, 2001: Flight AA77 could not have been hijacked!, Voltaire Network, 30 November 2009.
    2. Excerpt from a Chicago Tribune article, September 16, 2001.
    3. Los Angeles Times, September 21, 2001.
    4. Globe Star, September 27, 2001.
    5. Chicago Tribune.
    6. New York Times obituary, September 13, 2001.
    Pino Cabras - Italian journalist and Director of the alternative information site Megachip. His most recently published book is Strategie per una guerra mondiale. Dall'11 settembre al delitto Bhutto (Aisara, 2008 )